BravoSmart Facebook Account BravoSmart Twitter Account BravoSmart LinkedIn Account BravoSmart YouTube Account
Register

BravoSmart Web Design Blog

Our blog discusses ways to use the web to improve your business or organization. Plus, get helpful tips on search engine optimization, Joomla content management, email marketing, social media, and more. Please feel free to join in the discussion.

BravoSmart Web Design Blog

A short description about your blog
Tags >> duplicate content
Apr 18
2011

URL Structure for SEO

Posted by Kyle Deming in SEO Campaigns , duplicate content

To www or not to www?

One of the most important things you can do to improve the search engine optimization of your website is to solve the so-called "canonicalization" issue. Basically, you want to make sure that you don't have multiple links that all point to the same page.

Believe it or not, there is a different between "www.mydomain.com" and "mydomain.com." Technically speaking "www." is a subdomain of "mydomain.com".  If you wanted, you could actually set up completely different websites on those two different domains!

"Canonicalization" is the process you go through to make sure that only one canonical (or, primary) domain leads to the webpage. Matt Cutts of Google has a good explanation of this topic.  There are a number of things you can do to solve this problem, but probably the best solution is to use a 301 redirect of one version to the other.

Should My Domain Name Use www or Not?

This leads to the question - which way is best? Different people in the industry have different opinions, so it can be difficult to know what to do.

I used to prefer domains without the www, but I've changed my mind in recent times. Although I know that you don't need to type in the www, it seems to me that the majority of users are still accustomed to typing the www in first. In my experience, the majority of backlinks coming into websites that haven't set up URL canonicalization use "www." in the link. I think if you decide to go with the non-www version, then you will still have a significant portion of people linking to you with the www version anyways.
Even though you can and should certainly set up URL canonicalization, it's still best practice to have links coming in consistently to the same version of the URL. If all of your links are formatted the same, and you've set up proper URL canonicalization, then there will be overwhelming evidence in favor of your preferred version of the URL. I think you are more likely to get that result if you use the www than if you don't.

Nevertheless, this is such a marginal issue that I wouldn't make a big change if you have already set up your canonical URL without the www. The most important thing is to be completely consistent on your own website.

Just my two cents - what do you think? Do you prefer domain names with or without the "www?"

Dec 07
2010

Domain Forwarding Dangers

Posted by Kyle Deming in duplicate content , domains

Loading up on domain names is often the first step taken to improve SEO. Who wouldn't want a bunch of keyword rich domain names to point to their site? Unfortunately, this tactic doesn't usually yield good results, and can actually be dangerous is handled incorrectly. Read on to learn the right way to forward your domains so that you don't hurt your rankings.

Blog Tags

Subscribe to Our Blog

Subscribe to the Bravo:Smart Web Design Blog and get up to date information on topics such as Search Engine Optimization, Web Design, eCommerce, and More!

Subscribe!

Subscribe Today!

Subscribe to the BravoSmart monthly newsletter for tips on web design, search engine optimization, and internet marketing. Get special access to free materials and discounts.